PUBLICATION ETHICS OF THE JOURNAL "O‘ZBEKISTON ARXEOLOGIYASI"

1. Introduction

1.1. The Role of Publication

Publishing materials in peer-reviewed journals serves as a means of promoting scientific ideas both within the academic community and beyond, making a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. In this regard, the founder and editorial board of the journal "O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi", as well as authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and other individuals involved in the publication process, must adhere to ethical norms of conduct.

1.2. Publisher's Responsibilities

The publisher supports scientific communication, funds the editorial and publishing process, supervises the production and release of the journal, and is responsible for ensuring compliance with current standards and recommendations.

1.3. Ensuring the Integrity of Scientific Information
The publisher is responsible for ensuring the accuracy of scientific information and the integrity of scientific research in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in this document.

 

2. Responsibilities of the Editor-in-Chief

2.1 Decision on Publication

The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) of the scientific journal "O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi" is responsible for making the final decision on the publication of manuscripts, occasionally sharing this responsibility with the editorial board. The decision should be based on the accuracy of the submitted work and its scientific significance. The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) must follow the principles of the editorial board of "O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi", guided by current legislative norms regarding defamation, plagiarism, and copyright protection. The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) has the right to consult with reviewers (or relevant representatives of the publisher) when making the final decision on publication.

2.2 Impartiality

The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) must evaluate the intellectual content of manuscripts without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, origin, nationality, or political views.

2.3 Confidentiality

The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) and the editorial board of "O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi" must not disclose information about the manuscript under review without justifiable reasons. Any details should not be shared with third parties, except for the authors, reviewers, academic consultants, and the publisher.

2.4. Non-Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1. Use of Unpublished Data

Unpublished data obtained from manuscripts under consideration should not be used by editors in their own research without the written consent of the authors. Information or ideas acquired during the peer review process must remain confidential and should not be used for personal gain.

2.4.2. Conflict of Interest

The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) must recuse themselves from reviewing the manuscript and must not collaborate with other members of the editorial board who will review the manuscript in cases of a conflict of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other interactions and relationships with the authors, companies, or organizations related to the manuscript.

2.5. Supervision of the Accuracy of Publications

If the Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) receives convincing evidence that claims or conclusions presented in a publication are erroneous, they must notify the publisher with the aim of making necessary corrections, retracting the publication, issuing a statement of concern, or taking other actions appropriate to the situation.

2.6. Collaboration in Case of Ethical Claims

The Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief), in cooperation with the publisher, will take appropriate responsive measures in the case of ethical claims concerning reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures include interacting with the authors of the manuscript and addressing the respective complaint or request but may also involve cooperation with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of Reviewers

3.1 Impact on Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) in deciding about publication and, through constructive interaction with the authors, enhances the quality of the work. Peer review is a necessary part of scientific communication and forms the foundation of the scientific approach.

3.2 Responsibility

Any chosen reviewer who concludes that they lack the necessary expertise to review the manuscript or do not have enough time to complete the work promptly must notify the Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) of "O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi" and request to be excluded from the review process for that manuscript.

3.3 Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. The submitted article must not be shown or discussed with anyone who has not been authorized by the Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief).

3.4 Reviewing Standards and Objectivity

Reviewers must provide an objective evaluation. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should justify their opinions with clear reasoning.

3.5 Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify significant published works relevant to the manuscript's topic that are not included in the manuscript's bibliography. Any statement (observation, conclusion, or argument) made in the manuscript that has been previously published must include the appropriate bibliographic reference. Reviewers should also bring to the attention of the Editor-in-Chief (or Deputy Editor-in-Chief) any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under review and other published works within the reviewer's scientific expertise.

3.6. Policy on Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1 Unpublished data obtained from manuscripts under review should not be used by reviewers in their personal research without the author's written consent. Information or ideas derived from the review process that could offer competitive advantages must remain confidential and should not be used for personal gain.

3.6.2 Reviewers should refrain from participating in the review process if there is a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or any other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or organizations connected to the manuscript under consideration.

4. Responsibilities of Authors

4.1 Manuscript Requirements

4.1.1 Authors of original research must provide accurate results of the work conducted and an objective discussion of the research's significance. The data underlying the work should be presented without errors or distortions. The work should contain sufficient detail and bibliographic references. False or deliberately incorrect statements are considered unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

4.2 Originality and Plagiarism

4.2.1 Authors must ensure that the submitted work is entirely original. If the work of other authors is used, proper bibliographic references or excerpts must be provided.

4.2.2 Plagiarism is considered unethical behavior and is unacceptable. Plagiarism can take many forms: from presenting another's work as one's own to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's work (without attribution) and claiming ownership of the results of another's research.

4.3 Multiple, Redundant, and Concurrent Publications

4.3.1 An author should not submit a manuscript primarily focused on the same research, as an original publication in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is considered unethical behavior and is unacceptable.

4.3.2 An author should not submit a previously published article to another journal for consideration.

4.3.3 Publication of a certain type of article (e.g., practical recommendations, translated articles) in more than one journal may be ethical in some cases, provided that certain conditions are met.

4.4. Recognition of Sources

It is essential to always acknowledge the contribution of others. Authors must cite publications that are significant for the completion of the presented work. Data obtained privately, such as during conversations, correspondence, or discussions with third parties, should not be used or presented without written permission from the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources (such as manuscript reviews, grant submissions, etc.) should not be used without the written consent of the authors of the work related to the confidential sources.

4.5. Authorship of the Publication

4.5.1. Only individuals who have made a substantial contribution to the conceptualization, design, execution, or interpretation of the presented research can be considered authors. Those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. In cases where participants have made substantial contributions in specific aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged as individuals who have made a significant contribution to the study.

4.5.2. The author is responsible for ensuring that all individuals who have made significant contributions to the research are listed as co-authors, while those who did not participate are not listed as co-authors. The author must ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved of the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to submit it for publication.

4.6. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy

4.6.1. All authors are required to disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest in their manuscripts that could be perceived as influencing the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.6.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that need to be disclosed include employment, grants, and other financial support. Any potential conflict of interest should be disclosed as soon as possible.

4.7. Substantial Errors in Published Works

In the event that an author identifies significant errors or inaccuracies in a published work, the author must promptly inform the editorial board of the journal O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi. In such cases, the editorial board will work with the author to withdraw the publication or correct the errors as soon as possible. If the editorial office receives information from a third party that the publication contains substantial errors, the author is obligated to withdraw the work or correct the errors within the shortest time possible.

5. Publisher's Responsibilities

5.1. The publisher must adhere to principles and procedures that facilitate the fulfillment of ethical duties by editors, reviewers, and authors in accordance with these recommendations. The publisher must ensure that decisions are not influenced by any external interests.

5.2. The publisher must provide financial and legal support to the editorial board of the journal “O‘zbekiston Arxeologiyasi” in addressing ethical issues related to published materials and facilitate collaboration with other journals and/or publishers.

5.3. The publisher must promote sound research practices and implement appropriate standards, guidelines, and other organizational-methodological documents aimed at improving ethical recommendations, procedures for retraction, and correction of errors.

5.4. The publisher must ensure appropriate specialized legal support (consultation or advice) when necessary.

Top of Form